step one. But really, in the family history, all of us knowthat each laws discover a different. A vexing area ofgenealogy is that no body really knows how to use the latest conditions orrules having one decisive adjective like usually, possibly, probably,most likely, etc. It might be fascinating when the there other instances ofjointures are produced a year or a few once a known wedding day.
2. Can there be an enthusiastic extant dispensation towards marriage off ElizabethClifford and you can Sir Ralph Bowes who had been 3rd cousins thru Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh or fourth cousins, shortly after taken off the fresh new 5th LordClifford? That would restrict its relationship big date.
Arthur
Allegedly, in the event that an excellent dispensation try sought for and you can offered, it would havebeen of the among the many pursuing the, and may also are available in the newest correspondingregister book, in the event it survives:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop away from Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop regarding York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop out of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop regarding Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop regarding Carlisle 1509-1520
5. If for example the tenth Lord Clifford really does get married at the beginning of 1487 [say January] andhas E afterwards because seasons, really does the brand new chronology perhaps not really works?
John hands?
Age produced when you look at the later 1487, Henry created from inside the 1488/nine, Joan within the ,etc. filling out new names of upload away from . In the event the (a) thechronology still really kissbrides.com reference works; and (b) their unique matrimony bit was not lower; thenwe have only the latest 1505 pedigree of Henry VII’s that is inside oppositionto new supposition one she are a valid child.
six. About your 1505 pedigree: Are definitely the Clifford daughters the onlyknown Henry VII affairs excluded? Have there been other people? In that case,won’t that echo defectively on this document since the a source?
Off contrasting You will find made from the newest c.1505 Henry VII Connections pedigreeswith the fresh new 1480-1500 Visitation of Northern pedigrees, which are
Throughout the c.1505 Interactions pedigrees, the latest Clifford children are perhaps not listedin a Clifford pedigree, but alternatively throughout the St. John pedigree. Because the I’mnot accustomed the brand new St. John family relations, pursuing the is the guidance asit appears from the c.1505 pedigree, since taken from new 1834 Coll. Better. etGen. blog post. The fresh phrasing during the quotations is exactly because appears inthe 1834 blog post (pp. 310-311).
«No. XII.»Away from my Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Pole, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.»f.288, 296, 317, 318.»Margaret Duchess regarding Somerset got three husbands.» Because of the «John Duke ofSomerset» she got «My personal Woman the fresh King’s Mom.» who had «This new Queen.» whohad «Prince «By the «Sir Oliver Saint John, basic partner.» she had 3 daus & 2 sons:
Good. «Edith, married so you’re able to Geoffrey Rod from Buckinghamshire.» They had:A1. «Sir Richard Pole, Knt. wedded for the Woman Margaret, dau. regarding theDuke out-of Clarence.» They had: «Harry. «A2. «Alianor, married so you’re able to Ralph Verney, Esq.» That they had: «John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[yet another youngster, unnamed].»
B. «John Ssint John, esq.» He had five children:B1. «Sir John Saint John, Knight.» who’d «Five daughters and you will oneson.»B2. «Anne, wedd. to Harry Lord Clifford.» They’d «Jane. Mabill.Henry, young buck and you will heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.»B3. «Age, wedded so you’re able to Thomas Kent, Esq. away from Lincolnshire.»B4. «A good Nun out-of Shaftesbury.»B5. «Oliver Saint John.»
C. «Dame Mary, wedded so you’re able to Sir Richard Frognall.» They’d:C1. «Edmond Frognall and his awesome brethren and sistren.» Which have issueindicated, not named.C2. «Age, wedded so you can Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.»
D. «Age, married very first on the Lord Zouche; just after toward LordScrope out of Bolton.» Issue:D1. [of the Zouche] » Catesby.» That they had:»Age. George. John. William.»D2. [because of the Scrope] » Conyers.» Which have issueindicated not named.
Margaret Duchess of Somerset, from the «Lionel Lord Welles, last husband.»had: «John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. regarding K. Edward IV.» andthey had «E.»